In a properly scaled chart geometry should work, however while working with a chart with RTH data only I was expecting geometry to not be effective across trading sessions (i.e. beyond the RTH for the day). So a few questions arise and I am trying to put them down so it makes sense

In the ES 2m chart below for example one would expect that Geometry, which one tries to "bring out" by proper scaling, would be lost where charts are truncated, I.e. some of the data (non RTH) has been truncated in effect foreshortening the time axis and so I would expect the geometry from the previous day to not hold the next day. In the chart we do see there are price disconnects between close of day to the open next day - this would be expected. But if we look at the price action over the few days in this chart the price action still responds to trend lines drawn in earlier sessions.
Is this kind of behavior seen for geometric patterns other than trend lines where price action still responds to the other patterns or would it be fair to say if one is using a truncated RTH chart applying Geometry beyond intraday does not work?
Can price action responding to trend lines across days for (this/a) truncated chart, be explained by an argument along the lines:
- Once a proper chart scaling is found for an instrument, changes in volatility can be accounted for by simply using a (sub)multiple of the scale;
- In this example the lower volatility (energy) of the market and instrument non RTH is automatically compensated by Time axis truncation in effect for the lower volume / Energy periods?
- what does this say if we are using a chart with all session data included?
- should we use a chart where there are two scales ie one for RTH and one for ETH
- or as an extension the scale varies as energy in the market changes... just a question
... my eyes are already crossed over twice, have to get my self back to the land of the...
hopefully some one can shed some light and straighten me out.
TIA
srj